As he worked his way through dozens of bill signings last week, Gov. Sonny Perdue put his signature on SB 27, a measure that designates April as Confederate Heritage/History Month and sets the stage for the upcoming observance of the Civil War sesquicentennial.
Fighting an old war again
I wonder if Perdue even paused to ponder the irony of his signing a piece of legislation that compels an official recognition of the Confederate States of America.
Perdue was elected governor in 2002 with the enthusiastic support of Confederate-flag-waving rural voters who were angry with Roy Barnes for changing the state flag. As he nears the end of his administration, Perdue again is bowing to the wishes of Georgians who long for the good old days of “the lost cause.”
Of course, there are decent business reasons for setting up a Confederate history month. The 150th anniversary of the Civil War is expected to draw tourists who want to look at historic battlefield sites. We might as well prepare for this influx of visitors and the money they could spend.
Two years before that date arrives, however, we seem to be caught up in another refighting of the War Between the States.
In recent weeks, political leaders in several southern states have been talking openly about the positive aspects of such concepts as "secession" and "sovereignty" and "states’ rights" and "nullification."
Republican Gov. Rick Perry of Texas was one of the first to mention secession, which he thought might be a good way for his state to throw off the burdens of an “intrusive” federal government. Insurance Commissioner John Oxendine, a Republican candidate for governor in Georgia, has expressed sympathy for the secessionist crowd as well.
The Georgia Senate passed a resolution in the waning days of the legislative session, SR 632, that declares the state can ignore federal laws if the state’s leaders think Congress doesn’t have the authority to enact such measures.
“All acts of Congress which assume to create, define, or punish crimes, other than those so enumerated in the Constitution are altogether void, and of no force; and that the power to create, define, and punish such other crimes is reserved, and, of right, appertains solely and exclusively to the respective States, each within its own territory,” says the quaint language of the resolution, which was copied from a document written by Thomas Jefferson in 1798.
Let’s call this what it is: crazy talk. The question of who prevails in a dispute between the federal government and the states was settled about 150 years ago in that struggle called the Civil War. These arguments about the supposed authority of states to do whatever they want to do – such as ignore Civil Rights laws – are the sort of thing we heard from John Birchers, white supremacists, and other extremists in the 1950s and 1960s.
It is a point of view that does have its supporters here. A recent poll of the state’s voters showed that among Republicans, one-third of them favored the idea of Georgia leaving the U.S. The overall support for secession among all poll respondents was 18 percent.
One of the major complaints you hear from critics of the federal government is the enormous amount of money being spent to address the problems caused by the current economic crisis. Sen. Chip Pearson, Sen. Chip Rogers and Rep. Tom Graves are among the most outspoken of Georgia’s lawmakers on this particular topic.
And yet, Pearson, Rogers and Graves voted to approve the supplemental state budget as well as the budget for fiscal year 2010 – and both budgets were only balanced after legislators agreed to accept hundreds of millions of dollars in federal stimulus funds.
If federal spending is so bad that we should be thinking about secession, then you need to put your money where your mouth is and send back all the stimulus funds.
But there you have it. The members of the political party whose greatest president fought a bloody war to prevent southern states from seceding are now in the forefront of dissidents who want those same states to secede. As we near the 150th anniversary of the Civil War, a large part of our population is ready to fight the war all over again.
If it sounds weird, it's just Georgia politics in action.
Tom Crawford is the editor of Capitol Impact’s Georgia Report, an Internet news service at www.gareport.com that covers government and politics in Georgia. He can be reached at tcrawford@capitolimpact.net .
Perdue was elected governor in 2002 with the enthusiastic support of Confederate-flag-waving rural voters who were angry with Roy Barnes for changing the state flag. As he nears the end of his administration, Perdue again is bowing to the wishes of Georgians who long for the good old days of “the lost cause.”
Of course, there are decent business reasons for setting up a Confederate history month. The 150th anniversary of the Civil War is expected to draw tourists who want to look at historic battlefield sites. We might as well prepare for this influx of visitors and the money they could spend.
Two years before that date arrives, however, we seem to be caught up in another refighting of the War Between the States.
In recent weeks, political leaders in several southern states have been talking openly about the positive aspects of such concepts as "secession" and "sovereignty" and "states’ rights" and "nullification."
Republican Gov. Rick Perry of Texas was one of the first to mention secession, which he thought might be a good way for his state to throw off the burdens of an “intrusive” federal government. Insurance Commissioner John Oxendine, a Republican candidate for governor in Georgia, has expressed sympathy for the secessionist crowd as well.
The Georgia Senate passed a resolution in the waning days of the legislative session, SR 632, that declares the state can ignore federal laws if the state’s leaders think Congress doesn’t have the authority to enact such measures.
“All acts of Congress which assume to create, define, or punish crimes, other than those so enumerated in the Constitution are altogether void, and of no force; and that the power to create, define, and punish such other crimes is reserved, and, of right, appertains solely and exclusively to the respective States, each within its own territory,” says the quaint language of the resolution, which was copied from a document written by Thomas Jefferson in 1798.
Let’s call this what it is: crazy talk. The question of who prevails in a dispute between the federal government and the states was settled about 150 years ago in that struggle called the Civil War. These arguments about the supposed authority of states to do whatever they want to do – such as ignore Civil Rights laws – are the sort of thing we heard from John Birchers, white supremacists, and other extremists in the 1950s and 1960s.
It is a point of view that does have its supporters here. A recent poll of the state’s voters showed that among Republicans, one-third of them favored the idea of Georgia leaving the U.S. The overall support for secession among all poll respondents was 18 percent.
One of the major complaints you hear from critics of the federal government is the enormous amount of money being spent to address the problems caused by the current economic crisis. Sen. Chip Pearson, Sen. Chip Rogers and Rep. Tom Graves are among the most outspoken of Georgia’s lawmakers on this particular topic.
And yet, Pearson, Rogers and Graves voted to approve the supplemental state budget as well as the budget for fiscal year 2010 – and both budgets were only balanced after legislators agreed to accept hundreds of millions of dollars in federal stimulus funds.
If federal spending is so bad that we should be thinking about secession, then you need to put your money where your mouth is and send back all the stimulus funds.
But there you have it. The members of the political party whose greatest president fought a bloody war to prevent southern states from seceding are now in the forefront of dissidents who want those same states to secede. As we near the 150th anniversary of the Civil War, a large part of our population is ready to fight the war all over again.
If it sounds weird, it's just Georgia politics in action.
Tom Crawford is the editor of Capitol Impact’s Georgia Report, an Internet news service at www.gareport.com that covers government and politics in Georgia. He can be reached at tcrawford@capitolimpact.net .
Defined tags for this entry: Opinions, Tom Crawford
Related entries by tags:
- OPINION: Math 123: Failed policy masquerading as progress
- OPINION: Ludlow signs off for last time
- OPINION: Enjoying the simple pleasures
- OPINION: A little bio info goes a long way
- OPINION: Trying week for all involved
- OPINION: All in all, 2010 not a bad year
- OPINION: 25 things you probably don’t want to know about me
- OPINION: Family makes holidays special
- OPINION: ‘Dandy’ Don a trendsetter in broadcast booth
- Thankful for lessons learned
It also appears that Mr. Crawford has no understanding of the "War Between the States" and even refering to the conflict as a Civil War is incorrect. Civil wars are fought between parties of the same country and at the time of the War Between the States the southern states had broken ties with the US and established themselves as an independant government. From reading the Georgia Report that Mr. Crawford writes for, it seems this article is par for the course for Main Street News. Liberal left wing writers who support the agenda of more for those who do less and more from those who take less. Maybe Mr. Crawford should try to read a little history and study current events before he opines on matters he is sorely underinformed.
I was out of the office earlier this week. My nephew was taken to the emergency room Monday night and has been at the hospital since then. I apologize for being slow in approving the comments. I was so worried about my nephew that I was not thinking about the blogs. When I returned to work Thursday morning, I approved several comments at the same time. We appreciate all comments--criticism and praise alike.
Thank you,
Angie Gary
Editor